<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LINCOLN BARBOUR PHOTO &#187; photography pricing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lincolnbarbour.com/blog/tag/photography-pricing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lincolnbarbour.com</link>
	<description>Awesome Photography of Architecture, Travel, Lifestyle, and Food</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:04:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pricing Photography for Image Libraries</title>
		<link>http://www.lincolnbarbour.com/blog/2010/07/27/pricing-photography-for-image-libraries-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lincolnbarbour.com/blog/2010/07/27/pricing-photography-for-image-libraries-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lincoln Barbour</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shorties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A Photo Editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photo Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wonderful Machine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lincolnbarbour.com/?p=6021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;&#8230;in a world where photographers traditionally price their product based on usage, what is “unlimited” use worth? There have always been photographers who intentionally or unknowingly ignore the subject of licensing, or otherwise simply give away unlimited use of their pictures without charging a premium for it. Those tend to be young photographers who don’t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;&#8230;in a world where photographers traditionally price their product based on usage, what is “unlimited” use worth? There have always been photographers who intentionally or unknowingly ignore the subject of licensing, or otherwise simply give away unlimited use of their pictures without charging a premium for it. Those tend to be young photographers who don’t know any better, or established photographers who have found that it’s the only way they can compete, or they couldn’t be bothered with the extra work involved in understanding how image licensing works and explaining it to their clients.</em></p>
<p><em>However, in most of these cases, pricing photography “by the day” is a dysfunctional system, and not in the interests of the photographer or the client. There’s an inherent conflict when a photographer is compensated in inverse proportion to her productivity. The more photographs she produces, the less she is paid for each of them. Any photographer’s natural motivation will be to produce enough work to satisfy the expectations of the client, and no more. That is no way to run a business.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>by <a href="http://www.wonderfulmachine.com/" target="_blank">Jess Dudley</a></p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2010/07/27/real-world-estimates-pricing-photography-for-image-libraries/">A Photo Editor &#8211; Real World Estimates – Pricing Photography for Image Libraries</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lincolnbarbour.com/blog/2010/07/27/pricing-photography-for-image-libraries-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 3/11 queries in 0.090 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 602/615 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.lincolnbarbour.com @ 2012-02-08 02:38:25 -->
