<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for LINCOLN BARBOUR PHOTO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lincolnbarbour.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lincolnbarbour.com</link>
	<description>Awesome Photography of Architecture, Travel, Lifestyle, and Food</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:14:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Philly Vs Portland and a Look at Pricing by Matt Neumann</title>
		<link>http://www.lincolnbarbour.com/blog/2011/08/16/philly-vs-portland-and-a-look-at-pricing/comment-page-1/#comment-6396</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Neumann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lincolnbarbour.com/?p=9291#comment-6396</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a photographer based in Vancouver, Canada, and our city is suffering from a very similar situation as Portland, from the sounds of it.  Being that it&#039;s a liberal, artsy city, there are a lot of up and coming photographers, myself being one of them.  

I shoot some interior work, amongst other things, and while I know that my prices are not as high as the premium shooters in the city, I don&#039;t believe that I&#039;ve set them so low that I&#039;m undercutting. I&#039;m simply less experienced, with less high-end gear (I own no hotlights or tilt shift lenses, only flash and wide angles), and my pricing is set accordingly. 

A lot of photogs in the city do charge way too little though, and it&#039;s definitely creating an atmosphere of expectation that we will work for cheap, or even worse, for free.  &quot;No pay, but it&#039;ll be great for your portfolio&quot;, is a common phrase heard here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a photographer based in Vancouver, Canada, and our city is suffering from a very similar situation as Portland, from the sounds of it.  Being that it&#8217;s a liberal, artsy city, there are a lot of up and coming photographers, myself being one of them.  </p>
<p>I shoot some interior work, amongst other things, and while I know that my prices are not as high as the premium shooters in the city, I don&#8217;t believe that I&#8217;ve set them so low that I&#8217;m undercutting. I&#8217;m simply less experienced, with less high-end gear (I own no hotlights or tilt shift lenses, only flash and wide angles), and my pricing is set accordingly. </p>
<p>A lot of photogs in the city do charge way too little though, and it&#8217;s definitely creating an atmosphere of expectation that we will work for cheap, or even worse, for free.  &#8220;No pay, but it&#8217;ll be great for your portfolio&#8221;, is a common phrase heard here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twenty Eleven &#8211; A Year of Work by Vicki</title>
		<link>http://www.lincolnbarbour.com/blog/2012/01/17/twenty-eleven-a-year-of-work/comment-page-1/#comment-6363</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lincolnbarbour.com/?p=9485#comment-6363</guid>
		<description>Beautiful work Lincoln</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful work Lincoln</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Winner! PDN&#8217;s Objects of Desire Photo Contest by Tatiana Boyle</title>
		<link>http://www.lincolnbarbour.com/blog/2011/12/01/winner-pdns-objects-of-desire-photo-contest/comment-page-1/#comment-6301</link>
		<dc:creator>Tatiana Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 00:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lincolnbarbour.com/?p=9429#comment-6301</guid>
		<description>Great shot! Congratulations Lincoln!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great shot! Congratulations Lincoln!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lomo and Me by Mathias Tornqvist</title>
		<link>http://www.lincolnbarbour.com/blog/2011/12/13/lomo-and-me/comment-page-1/#comment-6155</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathias Tornqvist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 18:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lincolnbarbour.com/?p=9447#comment-6155</guid>
		<description>Good point. I stopped taking travel pictures the moment I went digital.

Maybe that&#039;s the key, shooting film. Sure, you&#039;ll spend many important moments taking pictures, but it always stop at the press of the shutter.

Then again, what would I do with all that exposed film?
Maybe I&#039;ll shoot with a non-digital camera. With no film in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. I stopped taking travel pictures the moment I went digital.</p>
<p>Maybe that&#8217;s the key, shooting film. Sure, you&#8217;ll spend many important moments taking pictures, but it always stop at the press of the shutter.</p>
<p>Then again, what would I do with all that exposed film?<br />
Maybe I&#8217;ll shoot with a non-digital camera. With no film in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lomo and Me by Lincoln Barbour</title>
		<link>http://www.lincolnbarbour.com/blog/2011/12/13/lomo-and-me/comment-page-1/#comment-6150</link>
		<dc:creator>Lincoln Barbour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lincolnbarbour.com/?p=9447#comment-6150</guid>
		<description>The X100 is definitely appealing. It&#039;s a little spendy for it is. Plus it&#039;s digital. So, you still get that instant feedback. You could turn it off, but I would be too tempted to look (chimp).

Shooting a film camera, you stay in the moment and what you get is what you get. It&#039;s low tech and that&#039;s what I like about the Lomo. No AF, rangefinder, auto exposure. It&#039;s a great street camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The X100 is definitely appealing. It&#8217;s a little spendy for it is. Plus it&#8217;s digital. So, you still get that instant feedback. You could turn it off, but I would be too tempted to look (chimp).</p>
<p>Shooting a film camera, you stay in the moment and what you get is what you get. It&#8217;s low tech and that&#8217;s what I like about the Lomo. No AF, rangefinder, auto exposure. It&#8217;s a great street camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lomo and Me by Mathias Tornqvist</title>
		<link>http://www.lincolnbarbour.com/blog/2011/12/13/lomo-and-me/comment-page-1/#comment-6149</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathias Tornqvist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lincolnbarbour.com/?p=9447#comment-6149</guid>
		<description>People are sometimes surprised when I tell them that I don&#039;t even bring a camera when I travel.
Photography is a lovely art, but it can only capture a fraction of the traveling experience. It&#039;s a bit like photographing your meals.
Worse yet, when you get good at photography, you will utilize all your tricks to manipulate how a potential viewer should feel when looking at the picture. It all becomes a bit of a con game. And ironically, that viewer is most of the time yourself.

I&#039;m toying with the idea of trying some 3D photography for my travels. But in reality it&#039;s probably just an excuse to get a new toy.

For a compact (ish) fun camera that does pretty well in low light, how about the Fuji X100? Then you don&#039;t have to worry about getting nice lenses, because you&#039;re stuck with the (excellent) one on the camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People are sometimes surprised when I tell them that I don&#8217;t even bring a camera when I travel.<br />
Photography is a lovely art, but it can only capture a fraction of the traveling experience. It&#8217;s a bit like photographing your meals.<br />
Worse yet, when you get good at photography, you will utilize all your tricks to manipulate how a potential viewer should feel when looking at the picture. It all becomes a bit of a con game. And ironically, that viewer is most of the time yourself.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m toying with the idea of trying some 3D photography for my travels. But in reality it&#8217;s probably just an excuse to get a new toy.</p>
<p>For a compact (ish) fun camera that does pretty well in low light, how about the Fuji X100? Then you don&#8217;t have to worry about getting nice lenses, because you&#8217;re stuck with the (excellent) one on the camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lomo and Me by Jon-Marc Hatton</title>
		<link>http://www.lincolnbarbour.com/blog/2011/12/13/lomo-and-me/comment-page-1/#comment-6146</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Marc Hatton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 06:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lincolnbarbour.com/?p=9447#comment-6146</guid>
		<description>Although I&#039;m far from a professional, I understand that feeling.  The camera is one of the most awesome tools to work with, but at the end of the day it can still be a tool.  I&#039;ll shoot a wedding with my DSLR and at the end of the day I&#039;ll have some amazing shots, but I was never there; I never actually saw the wedding.  I just captured a singular moment at a time through my viewfinder.  It actually gets me depressed sometimes.  I&#039;m going somewhere beautiful and go to pick up my camera when it hits me like a wall APERTURE, SHUTTER SPEED, ISO, &quot;HEAVY&quot;... etc.  I end up just taking pictures on my Iphone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I&#8217;m far from a professional, I understand that feeling.  The camera is one of the most awesome tools to work with, but at the end of the day it can still be a tool.  I&#8217;ll shoot a wedding with my DSLR and at the end of the day I&#8217;ll have some amazing shots, but I was never there; I never actually saw the wedding.  I just captured a singular moment at a time through my viewfinder.  It actually gets me depressed sometimes.  I&#8217;m going somewhere beautiful and go to pick up my camera when it hits me like a wall APERTURE, SHUTTER SPEED, ISO, &#8220;HEAVY&#8221;&#8230; etc.  I end up just taking pictures on my Iphone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lomo and Me by Lincoln Barbour</title>
		<link>http://www.lincolnbarbour.com/blog/2011/12/13/lomo-and-me/comment-page-1/#comment-6144</link>
		<dc:creator>Lincoln Barbour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lincolnbarbour.com/?p=9447#comment-6144</guid>
		<description>In hindsight, I wish I had. But then again, I might not have gotten the Lomo. Maybe it was fate.

For me, there are some functional aspects of the Olympus that prevent it from being a real replacement for a high quality compact digital camera. It&#039;s terrible in low light, the live view is not accurate for exposure, and the model I have only has one control dial; so I can&#039;t control aperture and shutter at the same time.

I&#039;m thinking of upgrading the EP-3, but I haven&#039;t tested it thoroughly. I also need to get some better lenses for it. Since I don&#039;t use this camera for work shoots, it&#039;s hard to justify dropping that much coin on all the lenses I would want.

For now though, the Lomo fills a nice void between my iPhone and the Olympus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In hindsight, I wish I had. But then again, I might not have gotten the Lomo. Maybe it was fate.</p>
<p>For me, there are some functional aspects of the Olympus that prevent it from being a real replacement for a high quality compact digital camera. It&#8217;s terrible in low light, the live view is not accurate for exposure, and the model I have only has one control dial; so I can&#8217;t control aperture and shutter at the same time.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m thinking of upgrading the EP-3, but I haven&#8217;t tested it thoroughly. I also need to get some better lenses for it. Since I don&#8217;t use this camera for work shoots, it&#8217;s hard to justify dropping that much coin on all the lenses I would want.</p>
<p>For now though, the Lomo fills a nice void between my iPhone and the Olympus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lomo and Me by Josh Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.lincolnbarbour.com/blog/2011/12/13/lomo-and-me/comment-page-1/#comment-6143</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lincolnbarbour.com/?p=9447#comment-6143</guid>
		<description>Surprised you even brought your 5D.  I would have thought you would have just brought that Olympus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surprised you even brought your 5D.  I would have thought you would have just brought that Olympus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Winner! PDN&#8217;s Objects of Desire Photo Contest by Nina Beilby</title>
		<link>http://www.lincolnbarbour.com/blog/2011/12/01/winner-pdns-objects-of-desire-photo-contest/comment-page-1/#comment-6069</link>
		<dc:creator>Nina Beilby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 22:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lincolnbarbour.com/?p=9429#comment-6069</guid>
		<description>Congratulations, Lincoln. You deserve it for all your hard work and stunning imagery!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations, Lincoln. You deserve it for all your hard work and stunning imagery!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 5/23 queries in 0.027 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 637/651 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.lincolnbarbour.com @ 2012-02-03 18:05:25 -->
